An Analysis of the Challenges and Opportunities for Governance in Indonesia during the Digital Transformation of Public Organisations

Authors

  • Hernawan Institut Teknologi dan Bisnis Nobel Indonesia, South Sulawesi, Indonesia
  • Indra Dharma Wijaya Politeknik Negeri Malang, East Java, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37476/presed.v2i1.45

Keywords:

Digital Transformation, Public Organisations, Governance

Abstract

The swift progress of digital technology has fundamentally transformed several industries, including governmental administrations, which are progressively embracing digital transformation to improve governance in Indonesia. Nevertheless, the incorporation of digital technology into the operations of the public sector brings up both obstacles and prospects that need meticulous scrutiny. The objective of this study is to investigate the effects of digital transformation on governance in Indonesian public organisations, with a specific emphasis on finding both significant obstacles and potential advantages. Employing a qualitative research methodology, data was gathered by means of comprehensive interviews conducted with government officials, experts in digital transformation, and policy analysts. The study also included the examination of pertinent government papers, policies, and strategic plans through document analysis. The results demonstrate that digital transformation presents substantial prospects for enhancing efficiency, transparency, and public service provision. However, it also presents obstacles such as reluctance to embrace change, insufficient digital literacy, and inadequate infrastructure. Moreover, the research emphasises the significance of leadership, organisational culture, and policy frameworks in effectively managing the process of digital transformation. The research indicates that in order for public organisations in Indonesia to fully exploit the possibilities offered by digital transformation, it is necessary to strategically prioritise the resolution of these issues through specific interventions, capacity development, and inclusive policy-making. This study offers significant insights for policymakers and public sector leaders who want to execute efficient digital transformation initiatives, ultimately resulting in more responsive and accountable government in Indonesia.

References

Ahmed, T., Rizvi, S. J. R., Rasheed, S., Iqbal, M., Bhuiya, A., Standing, H., … Waldman, L. (2020). Digital Health and Inequalities in Access to Health Services in Bangladesh: Mixed Methods Study. JMIR MHealth and UHealth, 8(7), e16473. https://doi.org/10.2196/16473

Alami, H., Lehoux, P., Shaw, S. E., Papoutsi, C., Rybczynska-Bunt, S., & Fortin, J.-P. (2022). Virtual Care and the Inverse Care Law: Implications for Policy, Practice, Research, Public and Patients. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(17), 10591. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191710591

Alghamdi, N. S., & Alghamdi, S. M. (2022). The Role of Digital Technology in Curbing COVID-19. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(14), 8287. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19148287

Alvarado, J. R., Lainfiesta, X., Paniagua-Avila, A., & Asturias, G. (2022). Developing a Digital Technology System to Address COVID-19 Health Needs in Guatemala: A Scientific Diaspora Case Study. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 7, 899611. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2022.899611

Andrade, A. Q., Calabretto, J.-P., Pratt, N. L., Kalisch-Ellett, L. M., Kassie, G. M., LeBlanc, V. T., … Roughead, E. E. (2022). Implementation and Evaluation of a Digitally Enabled Precision Public Health Intervention to Reduce Inappropriate Gabapentinoid Prescription: Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 24(1), e33873. https://doi.org/10.2196/33873

Bagayoko, C.-O., Bediang, G., Anne, A., Niang, M., Traoré, A.-K., & Geissbuhler, A. (2017). Digital health and the need to develop centers of expertise in Sub-Saharan Africa: Two examples in Mali and Cameroon. Medecine et Sante Tropicales, 27(4), 348–353. https://doi.org/10.1684/mst.2017.0726

Bello-Bravo, J., Brooks, I., Lutomia, A. N., Bohonos, J., Medendorp, J., & Pittendrigh, B. (2021). Breaking out: the turning point in learning using mobile technology. Heliyon, 7(3), e06595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06595

Braun, V., Clarke, V., Boulton, E., Davey, L., & McEvoy, C. (2021). The online survey as a qualitative research tool. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 24(6), 641–654.

Brown, A., Fishenden, J., Thompson, M., & Venters, W. (2017). Appraising the impact and role of platform models and Government as a Platform (GaaP) in UK Government public service reform: Towards a Platform Assessment Framework (PAF). Government Information Quarterly, 34(2), 167–182. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.03.003

Chen, X., Tang, X., & Xu, X. (2022). Digital technology-driven smart society governance mechanism and practice exploration. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-022-0200-x

Corsi, A., Pagani, R. N., Kovaleski, J. L., & Luiz, V. (2019). Technology transfer for sustainable development: Social impacts depicted and some other answers to a few questions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 118522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118522

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.

Denhardt, R. B., & Denhardt, J. V. (2000). The new public service: Serving rather than steering. Public Administration Review, 60(6), 549–559. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00117

Ebenso, B., Okusanya, B., Okunade, K., Akeju, D., Ajepe, A., Akaba, G. O., … Allsop, M. J. (2021). What Are the Contextual Enablers and Impacts of Using Digital Technology to Extend Maternal and Child Health Services to Rural Areas? Findings of a Qualitative Study From Nigeria. Frontiers in Global Women’s Health, 2, 670494. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2021.670494

Fang, M. L., Walker, M., Wong, K. L. Y., Sixsmith, J., Remund, L., & Sixsmith, A. (2022). Future of digital health and community care: Exploring intended positive impacts and unintended negative consequences of COVID-19. Healthcare Management Forum, 35(5), 279–285. https://doi.org/10.1177/08404704221107362

Hardin, R. (2008). Normative Methodology. The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology, (September), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286546.003.0002

Hou, Y., Xu, L., & Chen, L. (2022). Hotspots and Cutting-Edge Visual Analysis of Digital Museum in China Using Data Mining Technology. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2022, 7702098. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7702098

Kawale, P., Grant, L., & Pagliari, C. (2020). Digital health and financial good-governance: a mixed methods study of patient revenue capture in Malawi. Journal of Global Health Reports, 4. https://doi.org/10.29392/001c.12258

Kuziemski, M., & Misuraca, G. (2020). AI governance in the public sector: Three tales from the frontiers of automated decision-making in democratic settings. Telecommunications Policy, 44(6), 101976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2020.101976

Lyu, Y., Peng, Y., Liu, H., & Hwang, J.-J. (2022). Impact of Digital Economy on the Provision Efficiency for Public Health Services: Empirical Study of 31 Provinces in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(10), 5978. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19105978

Madyatmadja, E. D., Prabowo, H., & Kosala, R. (2017). IT Governance in digital era in Jakarta Provincial Government. Proceedings of 2016 International Conference on Information Management and Technology, ICIMTech 2016, 155–158. School of Information Systems, Bina Nusantara University, Jakarta, Indonesia: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIMTech.2016.7930321

Mishra, S. B., & Alok, S. (2022). Handbook of research methodology. Educreation publishing.

Na-Nan, K., Roopleam, T., & Wongsuwan, N. (2019). Validation of a digital intelligence quotient questionnaire for employee of small and medium-sized Thai enterprises using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Kybernetes. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-01-2019-0053

Neumeyer, X., Santos, S. C., & Morris, M. H. (2021). Overcoming barriers to technology adoption when fostering entrepreneurship among the poor: The role of technology and digital literacy. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 68(6), 1605–1618. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2020.2989740

Pariyasiri, A. (2022). Digital Transformation of Public Service by MAEHIA Municipality. International Conference on Digital Government Technology and Innovation, DGTi-Con 2022 - Proceedings, 60–65. Maehia Municipality, Chiang Mai, Thailand: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. https://doi.org/10.1109/DGTi-CON53875.2022.9849201

Patton, M. Q. (2005). Qualitative research. In Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioral science. Wiley Online Library.

Pomputius, A. (2020). Assistive Technology and Software to Support Accessibility. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 39(2), 203–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2020.1744380

Poss-Doering, R., Kuehn, L., Kamradt, M., Glassen, K., & Wensing, M. (2020). Applying Digital Information Delivery to Convert Habits of Antibiotic Use in Primary Care in Germany: Mixed-Methods Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(10), e18200. https://doi.org/10.2196/18200

Prakasa, Y., Raharjo, K., & Wiratama, I. D. (2020). Transformational Leadership and Digital Maturity: The Mediating Role of Organizational Culture. 154(AICoBPA 2019), 224–229.

Seifert, A., & Charness, N. (2022). Digital transformation of everyday lives of older Swiss adults: use of and attitudes toward current and future digital services. European Journal of Ageing, 19(3), 729–739. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-021-00677-9

Shafritz, J. M., Russell, E. W., Borick, C. P., & Hyde, A. C. (2017). Introducing public administration. New York and London: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.1080/00922013.1975.11000035

Shariman, T. P. N. T., Razak, N. A., & Noor, N. F. M. (2012). Digital Literacy Competence for Academic Needs: An Analysis of Malaysian Students in Three Universities. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69, 1489–1496. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.090

Sheikh, A., Anderson, M., Albala, S., Casadei, B., Franklin, B. D., Richards, M., … Mossialos, E. (2021). Health information technology and digital innovation for national learning health and care systems. The Lancet Digital Health, 3(6), e383–e396. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2589-7500(21)00005-4

Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199248540.003.0013

Weerakkody, V., Omar, A., El-Haddadeh, R., & Al-Busaidy, M. (2016). Digitally-enabled service transformation in the public sector: The lure of institutional pressure and strategic response towards change. Government Information Quarterly, 33(4), 658–668. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.06.006

Zekos, G. I. (2003). MNEs, globalisation and digital economy: legal and economic aspects. Managerial Law, 45(1/2), 1–296. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090550310770875

Downloads

Published

2024-09-19

How to Cite

Hernawan, & Wijaya, I. D. . (2024). An Analysis of the Challenges and Opportunities for Governance in Indonesia during the Digital Transformation of Public Organisations. Proceeding of Research and Civil Society Desemination, 2(1), 236–243. https://doi.org/10.37476/presed.v2i1.45

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): Proceeding of Research and Civil Society Desemination

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Proceeding of Research and Civil Society Desemination

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.